|
|
Post by jdv on Jan 16, 2022 13:00:01 GMT -5
Top men:
"FBI Claims Attack on Synagogue ‘Not Specifically Related to Jewish Community’
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) claimed Saturday that an attack and hostage-taking by an armed Islamic terrorist at a synagogue near Dallas, Texas, was “not specifically related to the Jewish community,” prompting criticism online.
The terrorist had demanded the release of Aafia Siddiqui, also known as “Lady Al-Qaeda,” a convicted Islamic terrorist who had tried to kill U.S. soldiers.
The terrorist burst into the sanctuary during a Sabbath service at Congregation Beth Israel in Colleyville, Texas, and took several members of the community hostage, including the rabbi, before being killed by the FBI in a raid Saturday evening.
“We do believe that, from engaging with the subject, he was singularly focused on one issue and it was not specifically related to the Jewish community,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Matthew DeSarno.
“We will continue to work to find motives and we will continue on that path in terms of the resolution of the incident.” -------------------------------------------
Huh.
|
|
|
|
Post by jdv on Jan 17, 2022 13:18:27 GMT -5
AFTER massive backlash questioning why we even have a FBI, the agency now says the Muslim terrorist who attacked a synagogue in an effort to free another Muslim terrorist who blamed the Jews for her conviction was racially motivated. Strong work boys, strong work. You get a cookie & a new pair of acid washed shorts.
However other democrats aren't so sure - Michigan's attorney general Dana Nessel said the attack was motivated by "white supremacy" in a statement so stupid it boggles the mind.
The New York Times took a different approach today - they simply did not report the obvious head line news on the front page. All the news that's fit to bury.
|
|
|
|
Post by jdv on Jan 17, 2022 14:12:15 GMT -5
MOST vote getter in human history Joe Biden today told reporters that he didn't know what motivated the terrorist: "I don't think there is sufficient information to know why he targeted that synagogue why he insisted on the release of someone who's been in prison for over 10 years... why he was using anti-Semitic & anti-Israeli comments." --------------------------------------- Which is really weird considering that he said he knew that KYLE Rittenhouse's motivation was "white supremacy" despite Rittenhouse shooting only white people who were trying to kill him. And people are asking why was a obviously dangerous foreign national with a long history of crime allowed into the US in the first place: "The family of Malik Faisal Akram, the Islamic jihadi from Britain who took hostages in Congregation Beth Israel synagogue in Colleyville, Texas, Saturday, has “demanded to know how he was allowed into America despite a long criminal record,” says the UK’s Daily Mail. More than just his family should be asking this question. How was this man able to storm a synagogue in Texas and take people hostage at gunpoint when he shouldn’t have been allowed into the United States in the first place? If anything shows how broken our immigration system is under the regime of Biden’s handlers, it is this entire episode. Malik Faisal Akram’s brother Gulbar asked: “He’s known to police. Got a criminal record. How was he allowed to get a visa and acquire a gun?” ------------------------------ That's a very good question Malik, one I'm sure the press and FBI will get right on. pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2022/01/17/why-was-texas-synagogue-jihadi-allowed-into-u-s-two-weeks-ago-despite-long-criminal-record-n1550189 |
|
|
|
Post by Warpig on Jan 17, 2022 14:35:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jdv on Jan 19, 2022 13:54:52 GMT -5
Looks like the FBI - get this! - lied to reporters when it claimed to have saved the hostages. Turns out they saved themselves: "The last hour of the standoff, he wasn’t getting what he wanted. It didn’t look good. We were terrified. And when I saw an opportunity where he wasn’t in a good position, I made sure that the two gentlemen who were still with me, that they were ready to go. The exit wasn’t too far away. I told them to ‘go’. I threw a chair at the gunman and I headed for the door and all three of us were able to get out without a shot being fired." ----------------------------------------- One has to wonder why the FBI would first lie about motive of the attacker, one which was clearly motivated by racial animus, and then lie about saving the hostages? Both lies were easily, and immediately, debunked. Lying seemed to serve no purpose, either to the victims, the public at large, or the agency itself.
Yet they chose to lie anyway. Bad habits can be hard to break.
Perhaps there was one motive to lie - the FBI was warned but did nothing. They have a long history of ignoring warnings: the 9/11 attack (ignored their own agents), the Pulse Night Club attack, the Boston Bombing, the Fort Hood attack, Parkland shooter, the Nashville RV bomber - the list of examples is disturbingly long.
And of course, it was the FBI who let the attacker into the country in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by jdv on Jan 19, 2022 15:22:46 GMT -5
Apparently the FBI also violated it's own protocol by crashing in - after all, there were no hostages to free; no risk to the public. Questions being asked about how the attacker could afford airfare to NYC, money to travel to Texas, and money for a gun - which you'd think would be even more expensive to buy than a legal gun.
Either way, look for this story to disappear very quickly.
|
|
